Encourage the conclusion of consulting contracts and memoranda of understanding between Indian shipyards and U.S.experience when constructing the carrier, and coordinate on sea trials prior to commissioning the ship. private industry as appropriate, to validate the vessel’s engineering and production designs, imbibe best practices from the U.S. Support a partnership between the Indian Navy and the U.S.policy to allow for discussions about nuclear propulsion technology in order to, among other things, make the integration of EMALS technology a viable option for India’s next-generation carrier. Navy’s E-2C/D Hawkeye for airborne early warning and battle management and the fifth-generation F-35C Lightning strike fighter, so as to permit the Indian Navy to secure a combat advantage over its rivals’ air wings. Offer India access to various advanced aviation systems, such as the U.S.Explore the possibility of equipping India’s carrier with the electromagnetic aircraft launch system (EMALS).Recommendations for the United States The Fight Function Above all else, the Indian Navy should not succumb to the temptation to make collaborative development merely an exercise in procuring technology.Though cooperation on the fight, move, and integrate functions is likely to be most indispensable and rewarding, joint development should in principle span all the mission areas involved in carrier design.The principal objective underlying bilateral cooperation should be to ensure that India’s next-generation aircraft carrier-to include its air wing and its capacity for combat operations-will be superior to its Chinese counterparts.The prospect of a major Chinese naval presence in the Indian Ocean transforms India’s hitherto secure rear into a springboard from which coercive power can be brought to bear against the Indian landmass.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |